Review



mouse totalseqa dna barcoded hashtag antibodies  (Revvity)


Bioz Verified Symbol Revvity is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Revvity manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Revvity mouse totalseqa dna barcoded hashtag antibodies
    A) Sort strategy used for cell hashtagging in WT and KO FoxP3 heterozygote scATAC-seq experiment in . B) Combined UMAP of Tconv, KO Treg, and WT Treg as in , colored by Leiden clusters. C) scATAC-seq UMAP from , colored by number of unique reads per cell. D) UMAP from separated by <t>hashtag</t> assignment, with colored boxes corresponding to sort gates from S8A. E) Overlap between FoxP3 KO and WT populations (left) vs between Gata3 KO and WT populations (right), as measured by the Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI). LISI values range from 1 for complete separation to 2 for complete overlap (p value from Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). F) Quantification of CD44+ Tregs from across biological replicates.
    Mouse Totalseqa Dna Barcoded Hashtag Antibodies, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 832 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+totalseqa+dna+barcoded+hashtag+antibodies/bio_rxiv__2023__05__18__541358-338-6-20?v=Revvity
    Average 96 stars, based on 832 article reviews
    mouse totalseqa dna barcoded hashtag antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "An interwoven network of transcription factors, with divergent influences from FoxP3, underlies Treg diversity"

    Article Title: An interwoven network of transcription factors, with divergent influences from FoxP3, underlies Treg diversity

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2023.05.18.541358

    A) Sort strategy used for cell hashtagging in WT and KO FoxP3 heterozygote scATAC-seq experiment in . B) Combined UMAP of Tconv, KO Treg, and WT Treg as in , colored by Leiden clusters. C) scATAC-seq UMAP from , colored by number of unique reads per cell. D) UMAP from separated by hashtag assignment, with colored boxes corresponding to sort gates from S8A. E) Overlap between FoxP3 KO and WT populations (left) vs between Gata3 KO and WT populations (right), as measured by the Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI). LISI values range from 1 for complete separation to 2 for complete overlap (p value from Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). F) Quantification of CD44+ Tregs from across biological replicates.
    Figure Legend Snippet: A) Sort strategy used for cell hashtagging in WT and KO FoxP3 heterozygote scATAC-seq experiment in . B) Combined UMAP of Tconv, KO Treg, and WT Treg as in , colored by Leiden clusters. C) scATAC-seq UMAP from , colored by number of unique reads per cell. D) UMAP from separated by hashtag assignment, with colored boxes corresponding to sort gates from S8A. E) Overlap between FoxP3 KO and WT populations (left) vs between Gata3 KO and WT populations (right), as measured by the Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI). LISI values range from 1 for complete separation to 2 for complete overlap (p value from Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). F) Quantification of CD44+ Tregs from across biological replicates.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    mouse totalseqa dna barcoded hashtag antibodies  (Revvity)
    96
    Revvity mouse totalseqa dna barcoded hashtag antibodies
    A) Sort strategy used for cell hashtagging in WT and KO FoxP3 heterozygote scATAC-seq experiment in . B) Combined UMAP of Tconv, KO Treg, and WT Treg as in , colored by Leiden clusters. C) scATAC-seq UMAP from , colored by number of unique reads per cell. D) UMAP from separated by <t>hashtag</t> assignment, with colored boxes corresponding to sort gates from S8A. E) Overlap between FoxP3 KO and WT populations (left) vs between Gata3 KO and WT populations (right), as measured by the Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI). LISI values range from 1 for complete separation to 2 for complete overlap (p value from Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). F) Quantification of CD44+ Tregs from across biological replicates.
    Mouse Totalseqa Dna Barcoded Hashtag Antibodies, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+totalseqa+dna+barcoded+hashtag+antibodies/bio_rxiv__2023__05__18__541358-338-6-20?v=Revvity
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse totalseqa dna barcoded hashtag antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A) Sort strategy used for cell hashtagging in WT and KO FoxP3 heterozygote scATAC-seq experiment in . B) Combined UMAP of Tconv, KO Treg, and WT Treg as in , colored by Leiden clusters. C) scATAC-seq UMAP from , colored by number of unique reads per cell. D) UMAP from separated by hashtag assignment, with colored boxes corresponding to sort gates from S8A. E) Overlap between FoxP3 KO and WT populations (left) vs between Gata3 KO and WT populations (right), as measured by the Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI). LISI values range from 1 for complete separation to 2 for complete overlap (p value from Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). F) Quantification of CD44+ Tregs from across biological replicates.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: An interwoven network of transcription factors, with divergent influences from FoxP3, underlies Treg diversity

    doi: 10.1101/2023.05.18.541358

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Sort strategy used for cell hashtagging in WT and KO FoxP3 heterozygote scATAC-seq experiment in . B) Combined UMAP of Tconv, KO Treg, and WT Treg as in , colored by Leiden clusters. C) scATAC-seq UMAP from , colored by number of unique reads per cell. D) UMAP from separated by hashtag assignment, with colored boxes corresponding to sort gates from S8A. E) Overlap between FoxP3 KO and WT populations (left) vs between Gata3 KO and WT populations (right), as measured by the Local Inverse Simpson’s Index (LISI). LISI values range from 1 for complete separation to 2 for complete overlap (p value from Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). F) Quantification of CD44+ Tregs from across biological replicates.

    Article Snippet: Before sorting, cells were hashtagged with mouse TotalSeqA DNA-barcoded hashtag antibodies at the same time as staining with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies (BioLegend).

    Techniques: